Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Kirtsy
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • del.icio.us
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Gerber and BPA Update



Hi nice to see you again! Are you following me on Twitter? Have you subscribed for email updates to receive the 10 free healthy fruit and veggie recipe eBook? For full transparency view my disclaimer! Stop back soon!


A while back I posted on Gerber and BPA and admittedly, I was confused and disappointed but I my opinion, concern and post was based on what the company told me and a letter from them.  I was disappointed because Gerber’s a company I’ve wanted to trust and support. My kids ate Gerber and I wanted to not worry about what I used to feed them.  Well, today I have gotten a email from the Environmental Working Group about this issue as well as a comment from Zrecs (which I love).

 Here’s the comment from the Amanda with the Environmental Working Group and I think it might help some of you:

I just came across your post about BPA & those plastic Gerber containers, and I wanted to let you know that (to the best of our knowledge here at EWG), their plastic packaging really doesn’t contain BPA. The problem with the #7 rule is that for recycling, #7 actually just means “other” — a category that BPA-laden polycarbonate happens to fall into. Gerber’s layered polypropylene counts as “other,” so it gets the #7 even though it’s BPA-free. We tell people to avoid #7 plastic because most of it IS polycarbonate, but “bio” plastics made of corn also get marked #7 even though they’re BPA-free. It’s a catch-all.

It’s so frustrating to try to avoid the bad stuff when companies won’t give you real, clear-cut info, isn’t it?

Then Zrecs wrote me this comment:

#7 means “other.” Layered plastics composed of more than one plastic type generally fall into “other” because they are not recyclable using any of the other six sorting codes.

We have confirmed with Gerber that their organic baby food containers are a mix of plastic types numbers 1 and 2 and because they are a mix, they are not recyclable under either such category and are given a number 7 code for recycling. See the ZReport on BPA for more information.

This happens to be the greatest thing about blogging and working together. We can figure stuff out and learn from one another. This is why I love the internet and what I do!  It also is proof at how freakin’ confusing all of this BPA stuff is and knowing who to trust and not trust.  I hope that all of this is indeed true and that Gerber does not use BPA in their plastics but I still wonder why the letter written to me, defends the use of BPA?  It’s confusing and if the operaters of all companies were more informed on the issues, that would help also!   Hopefully, Gerber works toward eliminating BPA in all packaging, whether it be layered or not.  Like previously mentioned in past posts, air on the side of caution, ask questions and when in doubt contact the company directly for information.

 

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Kirtsy
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • del.icio.us
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Related Posts

  • Mommy Willa
    It's hard to hear but true none-the-less. We can't afford not to educate ourselves, especially when regulatory agencies are so accessable to large corporations. More reading on BPA in the home:

    http://www.squidoo.com/bisphenol-A

    http://hubpages.com/hub/Bisphenol-A-in-Plastic-...
  • Shelly Gudmunsen
    i just bought two toddler sippers from nalgene and they were produced without BPA. i wish i'd kept the sticker label so i could tell you what the plastic is called, but it sounded pretty high-tech. i agree that the best route would be to eliminate all BPA use in all their products, but i'm happy that they have this new line at least without BPA. i was told by a sales rep that the only risk of any BPA contamination in their original bottles is if the plastic cracks on the inside. (?) well, the sippers i bought are AWESOME cups that never leak and have a great design for easy cleaning by me and usage by my boys, ages 1 & 3. incidentally, the cups are labeled #7 on the bottom.
  • Yeah, industry as a whole is spending a lot of time defending BPA. Even Nalgene, who're taking it out of their products, say that BPA is safe and they're only making the move because of consumer concerns. It's so patronizing! Can't you just hear them? "Ohkay, silly consumers, if that's what you really want..."

    Baloney.

    Amandas last blog post..Imagine a tangled toxic mess
  • Thanks for sharing that information. I was sad to read your first post, but I'm happy to hear that #7 doesn't *mean* it isn't BPA-free...it just *probably means*...confusing!

    I agree with lindsey...that's why I made about 80% of my baby food, and now that he doesn't eat "baby food" anymore I just buy organic!

    Allisons last blog post..Silent Night
  • lindsey
    Gerber has taken quite the hit in sales since this news became common knowledge.

    Just another reason to make your own baby food.
blog comments powered by Disqus